Direct Democracy: A Comprehensive Guide to People-Powered Governance
Executive Summary
This document presents a comprehensive framework for implementing true Direct Democracy—a system where citizens directly participate in decision-making rather than delegating power to representatives. Current "democratic" systems are actually plutocracies controlled by wealthy elites. Through technological innovation, grassroots organizing, and systematic reform, we can establish genuine majority rule that eliminates hierarchy, prevents war and atrocities, and creates a more equitable society. This guide provides historical context, practical implementation strategies, technological solutions, and addresses common concerns about direct democratic governance.
Table of Contents
Understanding True Democracy
Let me start by explaining that the billionaire-controlled government and media you see today, along with the Democracy™ they advertise, isn't real democracy. Instead, it's a mix of aristocracy, oligarchy, plutocracy, with some kleptocracy thrown in. If you haven't already and don't recognize this reality, check out my article on How to Become a Freethinker (https://directdemocracyandgifteconomy.blogspot.com/2018/10/how-to-become-freethinker-warning.html) to learn how to escape The Matrix they've built and the indocrination you've experienced.
Etymology: The True Meaning of Democracy
Demos
Pronunciation: /ˈdiˌmɑs/, /ˈdiˌmɔs/
Definition: The regular citizens of an ancient Greek city-state; the general population of a state or region; the people
-cracy
Alternative forms: -ocracy
Pronunciation: /-kɹəsi/
Definition: governance (in terms of ruling)
Combined: Democracy = People Rule (majority rule through direct participation)
Core Principles of Direct Democracy
In genuine Direct Democracy, several fundamental principles apply:
No Hierarchy: Everyone has equal input in societal governance
Direct Participation: Citizens vote directly on issues, not for representatives
Majority Rule: Decisions reflect the will of the numerical majority
Transparency: All processes and results are open and verifiable
Accessibility: Every citizen can participate regardless of economic status
Without hierarchy, these become impossible:
War (requires command structures to organize violence)
Atrocities (need authority figures to order and execute)
Dictatorship (by definition requires hierarchical power concentration)
Historical Context and Examples
Ancient Precedents
Athenian Democracy (508-322 BCE)
Direct participation in the Ecclesia (citizen assembly)
Random selection for most government positions
Ostracism as protection against tyranny
Limitations: excluded women, slaves, and foreigners (about 10-20% of population participated)
Althing of Iceland (930-1262 CE)
World's oldest parliament, operated as direct democracy
All free men could participate in decision-making
Consensus-building through public debate
Functioned without a central executive authority
Indigenous Governance Models
Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy
Consensus-based decision-making for over 1,000 years
Women selected and could remove leaders
Seven-generation principle: consider impact on future generations
Influenced the U.S. Constitution's federal structure
Traditional African Ubuntu Philosophy
"A person is a person through other persons"
Community decisions through extended dialogue
Restorative rather than punitive justice
Collective ownership and resource sharing
Modern Examples
Switzerland's Direct Democracy
Federal referendums since 1848
Citizens can challenge any law through referendum
Initiative process allows citizens to propose constitutional changes
4-6 national votes per year on various issues
Results: Higher civic engagement, more stable policies, greater satisfaction with government
Taiwan's vTaiwan Platform (2015-present)
Digital platform for citizen participation in policy-making
Uses artificial intelligence to facilitate large-scale consensus
Successfully resolved Uber regulation, online alcohol sales
Combines online deliberation with offline workshops
Over 200,000 participants in various consultations
Current System Analysis
Past Questions And Comments I've Received
"But the US already is a Democracy."
No, it isn't. Democracy means majority rule through direct voting, nothing else.
"But it's a Representative Democracy."
Wrong again. For true Representative Democracy, the Constitution would need changes forcing representatives to actually represent the majority. What exists today in the US (and similar nations) is minority rule by the wealthiest, where "donations" and lucrative post-office jobs are simply legalized corruption.
What We Actually Have: Plutocracy
Definition: Rule by the wealthy few
Characteristics of Current Systems:
Policies favor donor class over majority opinion
Revolving door between corporations and government
Media ownership concentrated among billionaires
Electoral systems designed to limit choice
Lobbying expenditures exceed $3.5 billion annually in the US alone
Statistical Evidence of Plutocratic Rule
Princeton Study (2014) - Gilens & Page Analysis:
Examined 1,779 policy issues from 1981-2002
Average citizens have "little or no independent influence" on policy
Economic elites and business groups have substantial impact
When elite and mass preferences diverge, elites win
Policy vs. Public Opinion Gaps:
87% support Medicare negotiating drug prices (not implemented)
83% support universal background checks for guns (blocked)
76% support higher taxes on wealthy (rates decreased instead)
69% support marijuana legalization (still federally illegal)
Logical Fallacies Used Against Direct Democracy
"Direct Democracy means 51% impose their will on 49%"
Response framework:
"Is it preferable for 49% to impose their views on 51%?"
"What about 45 to 55? 40 to 60? 25 to 75? 1 to 99?"
"When does rule by the minority become better?"
"Our current system allows 1% to rule over 99%—is that preferable?"
"Mob Rule" - Aristocratic Propaganda
This term is designed to make you fear your own neighbors, family, and community. Everyone you know—family, friends, coworkers—they're all part of this supposed "mob." The real question: Would you rather be governed by them or by billionaires you'll never meet?
Technological Solutions
Blockchain-Based Voting Systems
Core Features:
Immutable Records: Once recorded, votes cannot be altered
Transparency: All transactions visible on public ledger
Decentralization: No single point of failure or control
Cryptographic Security: Military-grade encryption protects vote integrity
Technical Implementation:
Voter Identity Verification → Encrypted Vote Casting → Blockchain Recording → Public VerificationExisting Platforms:
Voatz: Used in West Virginia pilot programs
Votem: Mobile blockchain voting platform
Democracy.js: Open-source voting framework
Decidim: Participatory democracy platform used in Barcelona
Security Considerations
Multi-Layer Security Architecture:
Biometric Authentication: Fingerprint, facial recognition, or iris scanning
End-to-End Encryption: Vote encrypted from device to final tally
Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Verify vote validity without revealing content
Distributed Verification: Multiple independent nodes confirm results
Paper Trail Integration: Blockchain records linked to physical backups
Cybersecurity Protocols:
Regular penetration testing by white-hat hackers
Bug bounty programs for security researchers
Open-source code review by international experts
Air-gapped systems for critical infrastructure
Real-time monitoring and anomaly detection
Addressing the Digital Divide
Universal Access Initiatives:
Public voting terminals in libraries, schools, community centers
Mobile voting units for rural and disabled populations
Multilingual interfaces supporting 100+ languages
Audio and visual accessibility features
24/7 technical support hotlines
Digital Literacy Programs:
Community workshops on digital voting
Peer-to-peer training networks
Simple, intuitive user interfaces
Practice voting systems for familiarization
Volunteer tech support networks
Privacy Protection Mechanisms
Anonymous Voting with Verifiable Results:
Ring Signatures: Hide individual votes within groups
Homomorphic Encryption: Perform calculations on encrypted data
Mixing Networks: Shuffle votes to prevent tracking
Commitment Schemes: Prove vote without revealing choice
Audit Trails: Verify system integrity without compromising privacy
Implementation Strategies
Phase 1: Local Foundation Building (Years 1-2)
Municipal Level Pilots:
Start with non-binding referendums on local issues
Partner with existing community organizations
Focus on concrete, immediate concerns (budget priorities, zoning)
Document success stories and lessons learned
Build trust through transparent processes
Coalition Building:
Engage unions, environmental groups, social justice organizations
Partner with tech communities for platform development
Collaborate with academic institutions for research validation
Connect with international direct democracy movements
Create cross-partisan appeal through shared values
Legal Framework Development:
Research existing initiative and referendum laws
Identify constitutional barriers and solutions
Draft model legislation for other communities
Build relationships with sympathetic lawyers and judges
Prepare for legal challenges from established interests
Phase 2: Regional Expansion (Years 3-5)
State-Level Initiatives:
Constitutional amendments enabling direct democracy
Referendums on major policy issues (healthcare, education, environment)
Electronic voting system pilots
Integration with existing state election infrastructure
Training programs for election officials
Technological Infrastructure:
Deploy secure, auditable voting platforms
Establish redundant data centers
Create backup systems and disaster recovery protocols
Implement user feedback and continuous improvement cycles
Open-source all software for transparency and security
Education and Engagement:
Civic education campaigns about direct democracy
Voter engagement programs targeting traditionally underrepresented groups
Media literacy training to combat misinformation
Deliberative polling and citizen assemblies
Integration with school curricula
Phase 3: National Implementation (Years 5-10)
Constitutional Convention Pathway:
Article V convention called by state legislatures
Draft new constitution incorporating direct democracy
National ratification campaign
Transition planning from old to new system
International recognition and legitimacy building
Federal Referendum System:
National initiative and referendum process
Regular voting on major policy issues
Citizen-initiated constitutional amendments
Integration with existing federal election calendar
Oversight and audit mechanisms
Phase 4: Global Integration (Years 10+)
International Frameworks:
Global governance issues (climate change, pandemics, space exploration)
Cross-border democratic participation for global citizens
International court system based on democratic principles
Global resource allocation through democratic processes
Planetary environmental management
Addressing Common Concerns
Minority Rights Protection
Constitutional Safeguards:
Bill of Rights remains inviolable regardless of majority vote
Supermajority requirements for fundamental rights changes
Independent judiciary to protect constitutional principles
Sunset clauses on all legislation requiring periodic reaffirmation
Ombudsman system for minority grievance resolution
Proportional Representation Elements:
Regional representation ensuring geographic diversity
Minority group consultation requirements
Cultural impact assessments for legislation
Veto powers for indigenous and marginalized communities
Affirmative inclusion programs
Informed Decision-Making
Citizen Education Infrastructure:
Deliberation Days: Paid time off before major votes for community discussion
Expert Panels: Non-partisan analysis of complex issues
Impact Assessments: Clear explanations of policy consequences
Debate Platforms: Structured forums for pros/cons discussion
Fact-Checking Services: Independent verification of claims
Information Quality Control:
Source verification requirements for campaign materials
Penalties for deliberate misinformation
Diverse media landscape preventing monopoly control
Public funding for educational content
Real-time fact-checking during debates
Preventing Manipulation and Misinformation
Campaign Finance Reform:
Complete elimination of private campaign contributions
Public funding for ballot measure education
Strict limits on advertising expenditures
Transparent disclosure of all funding sources
Criminal penalties for dark money contributions
Media Diversity Requirements:
Break up media monopolies
Public broadcast expansion
Community media support
Algorithm transparency for social media platforms
Right to reply laws for misrepresented groups
Time Management and Voter Fatigue
Efficient Voting Systems:
Bundled Issues: Related topics grouped together
Priority Ranking: Citizens set personal issue priorities
Proxy Voting: Temporary delegation for trusted individuals
Regular Scheduling: Predictable voting calendar
Quick Polls: Simple yes/no questions for urgent matters
Workload Distribution:
National issues: Quarterly voting
State issues: Bi-monthly voting
Local issues: Monthly voting
Emergency protocols: 48-hour expedited process
Vacation/holiday scheduling to maximize participation
Emergency Decision-Making
Crisis Response Protocols:
Emergency Council: Elected body for immediate response
Citizen Oversight: Real-time monitoring of emergency powers
Time Limits: All emergency measures expire within 30 days
Ratification Required: Post-emergency citizen approval
Abuse Prevention: Severe penalties for power misuse
Economic Integration
Transition from Capitalism
Democratic Socialism Integration:
Worker cooperatives as transitional structures
Public banking and credit unions
Universal basic services (healthcare, education, housing)
Progressive taxation funding democratic infrastructure
Gradual nationalization of essential industries
Gift Economy Development (see https://directdemocracyandgifteconomy.blogspot.com/2020/04/gift-economy.html):
Community resource sharing networks
Time banking and mutual aid systems
Open source everything (software, designs, knowledge)
Post-scarcity technology development
Ecological sustainability prioritization
Universal Basic Income and Democratic Participation
UBI as Democratic Enabler:
Economic security enables political participation
Reduced dependence on corporate employment
Time availability for civic engagement
Elimination of poverty-based political exclusion
Freedom to make principled voting decisions
Funding Mechanisms:
Land value capture taxation
Financial transaction taxes
Automation dividends
Natural resource royalties
Carbon and pollution pricing
Worker Democracy Integration
Cooperative Business Models:
Worker-owned enterprises as economic democracy training
Consumer cooperatives for essential goods
Housing cooperatives for democratic living
Credit unions for democratic finance
Platform cooperatives for digital economy
Corporate Governance Reform:
Mandatory worker representation on corporate boards
Profit-sharing requirements
Democratic decision-making for major business changes
Community impact assessments
Stakeholder representation beyond shareholders
Global Perspectives
International Cooperation Frameworks
Global Democratic Institutions:
World Parliament: Directly elected global legislative body
International Court of Democracy: Resolve disputes between democratic systems
Global Referendum System: Worldwide votes on planetary issues
Democratic Security Council: Conflict resolution through citizen participation
International Election Monitoring: Mutual oversight of democratic processes
Cross-Border Participation:
Dual citizenship rights for global mobility
Expatriate voting in home and residence countries
International worker representation
Global environmental governance participation
Shared resource management democracy
Addressing Global Challenges
Climate Change Response:
Global carbon budgets allocated democratically
International renewable energy cooperation
Democratic transition planning for fossil fuel workers
Citizen assemblies on geoengineering decisions
Global reforestation and conservation programs
Pandemic Preparedness:
Democratic global health governance
Citizen participation in public health policy
International medical resource sharing
Democratic oversight of pharmaceutical development
Global disease surveillance with privacy protection
Cultural Adaptations
Consensus Democracy Models:
Ubuntu-based systems in African contexts
Confucian harmony principles in East Asian implementations
Indigenous council methods in Americas
Scandinavian folk high school civic education
Middle Eastern majlis consultation traditions
Language and Communication:
Real-time translation for global participation
Cultural liaison programs
Indigenous language preservation and integration
Visual and symbolic communication systems
Culturally appropriate deliberation methods
Case Studies and Evidence
Current Direct Democracy Examples in Action
Switzerland Success Metrics:
80%+ voter turnout in referendums (vs 50% in representative elections)
Higher citizen satisfaction with government (7.5/10 vs 5.2/10 global average)
More stable policies due to citizen buy-in
Lower corruption levels (3rd globally on Transparency International index)
Higher social cohesion and trust metrics
Recent US State Examples:
Deep-red Nebraska joins progressive states in passing $15 minimum wage
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/nebraska-voters-approve-15-minimum-wage/story?id=92985074
Passed with 58% support despite Republican opposition
Demonstrates cross-partisan appeal of economic democracy
Ohio votes to legalize recreational marijuana, becoming the 24th state
57% approval despite establishment opposition
Generated $400+ million in tax revenue projections
Ohio votes to amend state constitution protecting abortion rights
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/07/1209092670/2023-results-key-ohio-elections
56.6% approval in traditionally conservative state
Overturned restrictive legislation through direct democracy
Money's Corrupting Influence
California voters reject drug pricing initiative
$130+ million pharmaceutical industry spending against
Demonstrates need for campaign finance reform in direct democracy
Analysis: This shows that even direct democracy can be corrupted by massive spending disparities, reinforcing the need for economic democracy alongside political democracy.
Academic Research Findings
Citizens' Assemblies Research (OECD 2020):
144 documented cases across 29 countries
86% of participants changed minds during deliberation
Higher quality decisions compared to legislative processes
Increased civic engagement lasting years after participation
More representative of population demographics than elected bodies
Direct Democracy Satisfaction Studies:
Swiss citizens report 7.8/10 satisfaction with democracy
Compare to: US 5.8/10, UK 6.2/10, France 5.5/10
Strong correlation between direct participation and trust in institutions
Reduced political polarization in direct democracy systems
Practical Tools and Resources
Implementation Flowchart
Community Organizing → Legal Research → Technology Development →
Pilot Programs → Evaluation & Refinement → Scale Up →
Legislative Change → Constitutional Reform → Full ImplementationTimeline for Democratic Transformation
Year 1-2: Foundation Phase
Form local committees (target: 100 communities)
Develop technology platforms (open-source)
Conduct initial pilot referendums (non-binding)
Build coalitions with existing organizations
Create educational materials and training programs
Year 3-5: Expansion Phase
Launch in 10+ states/provinces
Binding local referendums
State-level ballot initiatives
Technology platform refinement
International partnership development
Year 6-10: Transformation Phase
Constitutional convention organization
National referendum system implementation
Economic system integration
International cooperation frameworks
Full direct democracy operation
Resource Lists
Essential Reading:
"The Wisdom of Crowds" by James Surowiecki
"Participatory Democracy in Action" by Catherine Fieschi
"Digital Democracy" by Hélène Landemore
"The Technology of Nonviolence" by Mark Kurlansky
"Doughnut Economics" by Kate Raworth
Software Platforms:
Democracy.foundation (similar-projects): https://democracy.foundation/similar-projects/
Decidim: Participatory democracy platform
Consul: Citizen participation platform
DemocracyOS: Online voting and debate platform
LiquidFeedback: Delegated democracy software
Organizations to Connect With:
Democracy International
Initiative & Referendum Institute
Participatory Democracy Consortium
Platform Cooperativism Consortium
Global Ecovillage Network
Funding Sources:
Crowdfunding campaigns
Foundation grants (Ford, Knight, MacArthur)
Cryptocurrency donations
Cooperative economics
Time banking and gift economy networks
FAQ Section
Q: Won't direct democracy just become mob rule?
A: This is aristocratic propaganda. The "mob" they're referring to is literally everyone you know—your family, neighbors, coworkers, friends. The real question is: would you rather be governed by them or by billionaires you'll never meet who actively work against your interests?
Current systems already have "mob rule"—it's just a very small, very wealthy mob ruling over everyone else.
Q: How can average citizens make informed decisions on complex issues?
A: Citizens are already making these decisions—they're just doing it through representatives who often ignore their preferences and vote based on donor interests instead.
We'd implement:
Expert advisory panels providing non-partisan analysis
Deliberation periods with community discussion
Impact assessments explaining policy consequences
Educational resources and fact-checking services
Citizen assemblies for complex issues
Research shows that when given good information and time to deliberate, citizens make excellent decisions—often better than experts or politicians.
Q: What about minority rights?
A: Constitutional protections for fundamental rights would remain inviolable regardless of majority vote. We'd also implement:
Supermajority requirements for basic rights changes
Independent judiciary protection
Special consultation processes for affected minorities
Proportional representation elements
Ombudsman systems for grievances
Q: How would this handle emergencies requiring quick decisions?
A: We'd have emergency response protocols:
Elected emergency council for immediate response (24-48 hours)
All emergency measures expire within 30 days unless ratified
Real-time citizen oversight of emergency powers
Severe penalties for power abuse
Post-emergency citizen review and approval
Q: Wouldn't people vote themselves benefits and bankrupt the government?
A: This assumes people are purely selfish, but research shows otherwise. When people understand the full consequences of decisions, they make responsible choices.
Also, our current system already has this problem—politicians promise benefits to get elected, then deliver them to their donors instead of voters. At least with direct democracy, if people vote for benefits, they actually get them.
Q: How would you prevent vote buying and manipulation?
A: Multiple safeguards:
Complete elimination of private campaign contributions
Public funding for voter education only
Strict advertising limits
Criminal penalties for vote buying
Anonymous voting with verifiable results
Media diversity requirements to prevent monopoly control
Q: What about voter fatigue and low participation?
A: We'd implement:
Efficient voting schedules (quarterly for major issues)
Priority ranking so people focus on issues they care about
Proxy voting options for trusted individuals
Mandatory paid time off for voting
Simple, accessible technology platforms
Bundled related issues to reduce decision load
Q: How would this work for technical issues like nuclear safety or financial regulation?
A: Same way it works now, but better:
Expert advisory panels provide analysis (but citizens decide)
Impact assessments explain consequences in plain English
Citizen assemblies study complex issues in depth
Multi-stage voting process for technical issues
Real-world pilot programs before full implementation
The current system has experts too—they're just filtered through politicians who often ignore them when it conflicts with donor interests.
Q: Can't we just vote in better representatives instead?
A: The system is structurally corrupted beyond repair:
Citizens United allows unlimited corporate spending
Gerrymandering ensures safe seats for incumbents
Media controlled by same billionaires funding politicians
Revolving door between corporations and government
Primary system controlled by party establishments
Representative democracy was an 18th-century compromise due to communication and travel limitations. We now have technology for actual democracy.
Q: What if other countries don't adopt direct democracy?
A: Democratic countries would have enormous advantages:
Higher citizen satisfaction and social cohesion
Better long-term decision-making
More innovation and creativity
Higher economic productivity
Less corruption and waste
Greater international legitimacy
This would create pressure for other countries to adopt similar systems, just like previous democratic waves in history.
Q: How would this affect the economy?
A: Positively, based on evidence from existing direct democracy systems:
Switzerland has one of the world's strongest economies
Worker cooperatives outperform traditional corporations
Reduced corruption increases economic efficiency
Better education and healthcare improve productivity
More equitable distribution increases consumer demand
Long-term thinking prevents boom-bust cycles
Q: What about privacy in voting?
A: We'd maintain secret ballots while ensuring verifiable results through:
Cryptographic techniques that hide individual votes
Public tallies that can be audited without revealing personal choices
Strong legal protections against retaliation
Anonymous verification systems
Secure technology protecting voter identity
Corruption By The Few
Watch out for wealthy agents who attack Democracy, claiming it's the world's problem. Democracy is one thing only: majority rule via direct voting. What the wealthy call Democracy through their government and media mouthpieces isn't Democracy—it's another version of rule by the wealthy few. The wealthy want you to reject Democracy, which threatens their rule, in favor of Authoritarianism. Don't fall for it. Create new government where people truly rule and the wealthy few seeking your obedient servitude lose.
Be wary of "leftists" pushing Totalitarian Capitalism as a solution while calling it Socialism or Communism.
Also watch "rightists" promoting Bitcoin and other Capitalism patches as fixes. Capitalism can't be fixed—it is and always will be New Age Feudalism.
Political and economic hierarchy defenders fail to realize the majority can take everything away instantly, anytime, simply by rejecting both. The entire house of cards supporting the wealthy minority would collapse.
I Have A Dream Too
As adults, I think we all want to return to our innocence, but we feel trapped by our society, making some angry, spiteful, while others seek escapes. We can reclaim our innocence by abandoning the society we've been indoctrinated into our entire lives. We have power to change this world, not just for ourselves but for everyone.
When you see people defending the status quo, ask about their agenda or motivation. See if they answer.
I've found everyone, without exception, has an agenda. Some work for intelligence agencies (public and/or private), some "earn" livings from others' labor, enjoying leisurely lives being served by others. Always consider this when determining their agenda.
What's my agenda or motivation? Since everyone has one, including me, I'll share mine: simply ending all the suffering in today's world. If I wanted power, I wouldn't advocate #DirectDemocracy politically since that eliminates power for the few or one, nor would I support a #GiftEconomy since that eliminates economic hierarchy. I have nothing to gain except a better world for all life on this planet.
When you encounter others fighting for the status quo, remember to ask yourself and them: what's their agenda or motivation for maintaining it? You'll easily spot the agents from their responses.
We make this life Heaven or Hell for ourselves and each other—it's a choice, and we can change it anytime we want.
Glossary
Aristocracy: Government by a privileged upper class or nobility
Blockchain: Distributed ledger technology that maintains continuously growing lists of records, called blocks, which are linked and secured using cryptography
Citizen Assembly: A body formed from randomly selected citizens tasked with examining a particular issue and making recommendations
Consensus Democracy: Decision-making processes that seek unanimous agreement rather than majority rule
Deliberative Democracy: Democracy in which deliberation is central to decision-making, involving discussion and debate among citizens
Direct Democracy: Political system where citizens participate directly in decision-making, rather than through elected representatives
Gift Economy: Economic system where goods and services are freely given without explicit agreement for future returns
Kleptocracy: Government by those who seek chiefly status and personal gain at the expense of the governed
Liquid Democracy: Flexible form of democratic participation where citizens can either vote directly or delegate their voting power to a trusted representative
Oligarchy: Government by a small number of people, typically the wealthy or powerful
Participatory Democracy: Political theory emphasizing the broad participation of constituents in the direction and operation of political systems
Plutocracy: Government by the wealthy; a country or society governed by the wealthy
Proxy Voting: Practice of allowing someone else to vote on your behalf when you cannot participate directly
Representative Democracy: Type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people
Sortition: Selection of political officials as a random sample from a larger pool of candidates, used in ancient Athens and modern citizen assemblies
Supermajority: A requirement for a proposal to gain a specified level greater than half of votes to pass (e.g., two-thirds or three-quarters)
Tyranny of the Majority: Potential weakness in majority rule where the majority oppresses minority interests
Universal Basic Income (UBI): Social security system where all citizens receive regular, unconditional cash payments from the government
This document is a living document and will be updated as new information becomes available, so check back regularly for updates.
Last Updated: [Current Date]
Version: 2.0
Contributors: [List of contributors to be added]
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
No comments:
Post a Comment